Crypto Companies Enter Banking
In a major shift from their anti-establishment origins, prominent crypto firms like Ripple, Circle, and BitGo are now diving headfirst into the world of traditional banking. Their entry into regulated financial services is more than a business move—it reflects a broader industry transformation accelerated by a friendlier U.S. political climate toward digital assets.
This momentum coincides with the Trump administration’s increasingly supportive stance, which has emboldened crypto firms to apply for federal bank charters and expand into services such as payment processing, credit issuance, and custody solutions. The latest wave of expansion also includes Kraken, which plans to launch debit and credit cards by the end of the month, according to its co-CEO Arjun Sethi, who called it “a natural convergence.”
The lines between decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional finance are beginning to blur. This movement indicates a dramatic turn from the crypto sector’s earlier belief in bypassing traditional systems—suggesting instead a future where blockchain-powered companies become integral components of the financial mainstream.
National Bank Charters Sought
The pivot toward national trust bank charters marks a turning point in crypto’s journey toward legitimacy and integration. Unlike traditional banks, national trust banks are allowed to process payments and hold custody of digital assets—but not issue loans or take customer deposits. However, these charters eliminate the burdensome process of seeking separate licenses from each U.S. state, granting crypto firms more flexibility and reach.
Circle, the issuer behind the popular USDC stablecoin, sees obtaining a national trust bank charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) as a key step in embedding itself within the traditional financial system. Meanwhile, Ripple has applied for a Federal Reserve master account, which would allow it to hold reserves directly with the Fed—another sign of the industry’s increasing alignment with central banking infrastructure.
So far, Anchorage Digital remains the only crypto-native company with an active national bank charter. But if Circle, Ripple, and BitGo secure similar approvals, a new financial era could begin—one in which blockchain-backed institutions sit alongside legacy banks, subject to the same oversight.
Max Bonici, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine, captures the essence of this evolution:
“It’s a 180 from where a lot of these crypto companies started, saying ‘we don’t need banks, we don’t need laws, we’re above it all.”
Stablecoin Laws Drive Change
A major catalyst for this banking interest is the upcoming stablecoin legislation being debated in Washington. The proposed Genius Act would strengthen federal oversight of stablecoins by mandating that they be issued only by federally regulated banks or OCC-licensed institutions.
This framework would transform stablecoins—like USDC and USDT—from experimental digital currencies to fully integrated parts of the U.S. financial ecosystem. Stablecoin issuers would need to hold reserves directly with the Federal Reserve, increasing transparency, security, and regulatory accountability.
Under this evolving structure, companies like Ripple are positioning themselves strategically. A successful charter or master account would place them ahead of competitors and open access to Federal Reserve infrastructure—a major leap from their DeFi origins.
Additionally, stablecoin regulation is not just a compliance issue—it’s a competitive edge. It gives regulated players the ability to serve institutional clients, offer better liquidity solutions, and partner more directly with banks and government entities.
Traditional Fintech Joins Race
This banking integration isn’t limited to crypto-native companies. Major fintech firms are also aggressively entering the race to blend crypto and banking.
Robinhood, which saw more than half of its trading revenue come from crypto in 2023, is preparing to launch full banking services this fall. CEO Vlad Tenev has revealed plans to expand Robinhood’s offerings to include tax planning, estate planning, and other traditional financial services—building what he calls a “comprehensive financial platform.”
Similarly, London-based Revolut is aiming to secure a U.S. banking license, driven by its strong performance in crypto trading. On the other hand, Klarna, a Swedish consumer lending giant, has even more radical plans: CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski has stated ambitions to evolve Klarna into a crypto company.
Meanwhile, large U.S. banks like Bank of America are quietly preparing their own stablecoin offerings. These efforts are contingent on the finalization of regulatory frameworks but show how serious the traditional banking industry is about staying relevant in a crypto-integrated future.
Conclusion: Convergence is Inevitable
What we’re witnessing is more than just strategic expansion—it’s the convergence of two financial worlds. Crypto companies, once defined by their rebellion against centralized systems, are now embedding themselves within those very systems to scale, comply, and grow.
This shift not only provides new opportunities for financial inclusion, faster payments, and stable digital assets but also demands stronger oversight and risk management. The debate in Washington over stablecoin legislation will likely shape the next chapter in this convergence.
In the meantime, Ripple, Circle, BitGo, and others are setting the stage—proving that crypto’s future may be less about disruption, and more about integration.