qerranews 
Senate Delays Hearings
The US Senate Banking Committee has delayed markup hearings on crypto market structure legislation until 2026, dampening expectations for meaningful regulatory progress this year. The postponement comes despite earlier optimism that lawmakers would move forward before the end of 2025.
In a statement issued Monday, a spokesperson for Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott confirmed that no market structure markup will take place this year. The decision underscores the complexity of negotiating a comprehensive framework governing digital assets in the United States.
While the delay disappointed many in the crypto industry, committee leadership framed the move as part of a broader effort to achieve bipartisan consensus rather than rushing legislation through a divided Congress.
Bipartisan Talks Continue
According to the Senate Banking Committee, progress has been made behind the scenes with Democratic counterparts on a bipartisan digital asset market structure bill. Chair Tim Scott has repeatedly emphasized that any legislation governing crypto markets must have cross-party support to ensure long-term regulatory stability.
“Chairman Scott and the Senate Banking Committee have made strong progress with Democratic counterparts on bipartisan digital asset market structure legislation,” the spokesperson said.
They added that Scott has consistently engaged in good-faith discussions to craft a bill that provides clarity for the digital asset industry while reinforcing US leadership in financial innovation.
The emphasis on bipartisanship reflects lessons from past crypto-related proposals that stalled due to partisan disagreements. Lawmakers appear intent on avoiding a similar fate for market structure legislation that could shape the industry for decades.
Industry Reaction Mixed
The delay has triggered mixed reactions across the crypto sector. While some industry participants acknowledge the importance of bipartisan cooperation, others worry that continued postponements could erode US competitiveness as other jurisdictions move ahead with clearer crypto regulations.
Crypto investor and researcher Paul Barron expressed skepticism about the timeline, suggesting the bill may face further obstacles even in early 2026.
“The Market Structure Bill has fallen apart on the markup phase in the Senate … Early 2026 may also be in jeopardy as well,” Barron said.
Such concerns highlight growing frustration among crypto firms operating in the US, many of which have long argued that regulatory uncertainty hampers innovation, investment, and job creation.
Clarifying Regulatory Roles
At the core of the proposed legislation is a long-standing dispute over regulatory jurisdiction. The bill aims to clarify how the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversee crypto markets.
Under the framework discussed by lawmakers, the CFTC would become the primary regulator of spot crypto markets, while the SEC would continue to oversee securities-related digital assets. Industry leaders have largely supported this approach, arguing that it better reflects the decentralized and commodity-like nature of many cryptocurrencies.
Clear delineation between the SEC and CFTC is widely viewed as essential for resolving enforcement ambiguity that has plagued the industry in recent years, often resulting in regulation-by-enforcement rather than clear rulemaking.
Election Year Challenges
The 2026 midterm elections present another hurdle for crypto market structure legislation. All 435 House seats and 33 Senate seats will be contested, a political reality that often complicates bipartisan efforts on complex policy issues.
Historically, election cycles shift lawmakers’ focus toward campaigning rather than legislative compromise, particularly on topics perceived as politically risky or technically complex. As a result, even well-supported bills can struggle to gain traction during election years.
This dynamic raises questions about whether crypto market structure legislation can realistically advance in early 2026 or whether it could be delayed further until after the elections.
Funding Deadline Pressure
Beyond electoral concerns, congressional scheduling constraints may also slow progress. When Congress returns from its holiday break, lawmakers are expected to prioritize funding the federal government, as the current funding bill expires on Jan. 30.
Government funding deadlines often dominate legislative agendas, pushing non-essential bills to the sidelines. Crypto market structure legislation, despite its long-term importance, could be temporarily deprioritized as lawmakers focus on avoiding a government shutdown.
This crowded legislative calendar adds another layer of uncertainty to the timeline for resuming markup hearings.
Market Reaction Weakens
The regulatory uncertainty appears to have weighed on crypto markets. On Monday, spot crypto markets declined roughly 3.6%, with approximately $150 billion exiting the market in late trading hours.
Bitcoin fell nearly $5,000, dropping from just under $90,000 to slightly above $85,000, according to TradingView data. At the time of writing, the leading cryptocurrency has yet to recover those losses.
While broader macroeconomic factors also influence crypto price movements, analysts note that regulatory developments in the US continue to have an outsized impact on market sentiment, particularly for institutional investors.
Industry Seeks Clarity
Despite the delay, many industry participants remain cautiously optimistic that progress toward a comprehensive regulatory framework is inevitable. The growing integration of digital assets into traditional finance has increased pressure on lawmakers to act.
Major financial institutions, asset managers, and payment firms have expanded their crypto offerings, making regulatory clarity more urgent than ever. Without a clear market structure law, companies face uncertainty over compliance obligations and enforcement risks.
Proponents argue that a well-defined framework could unlock significant capital inflows, strengthen consumer protections, and position the US as a global leader in digital asset innovation.
Long-Term Outlook
While the Senate Banking Committee’s decision to delay hearings until 2026 is a setback for near-term expectations, it does not necessarily signal abandonment of crypto market structure legislation. Instead, it reflects the political and technical challenges inherent in regulating a rapidly evolving industry.
If bipartisan negotiations continue to progress, early 2026 could still mark a turning point for US crypto regulation. However, election-year dynamics and legislative bottlenecks mean the path forward remains uncertain.
For now, the crypto industry must continue navigating a fragmented regulatory landscape while awaiting clearer signals from Washington.