qerranews 
The crypto industry is once again stepping directly into US politics, this time targeting a Texas primary race. A crypto-backed super PAC has committed significant funds to oppose longtime Representative Al Green, arguing that his policy positions are hostile to digital asset innovation. The move highlights how crypto lobbying is becoming more organized and aggressive ahead of the next election cycle.
Crypto super PAC targets Texas race
A pro-crypto super PAC is pouring $1.5 million into a campaign to unseat Texas Representative Al Green in the upcoming Democratic primary. The group says the spending is meant to educate voters about Green’s anti-crypto stance and support more blockchain-friendly leadership.
According to statements reported by The Hill, the PAC Protect Progress will fund ads and voter outreach opposing Al Green. Protect Progress is affiliated with the larger crypto-focused political network Fairshake, which has become one of the most powerful crypto lobbying forces in US elections.
The group criticized Green’s role on the House Financial Services Committee, claiming he has worked against digital asset legislation and slowed innovation tied to blockchain and stablecoins. The PAC argues that Texas has a growing crypto community and deserves representation that supports responsible digital asset growth.
Why crypto policy became central
Crypto regulation has become a defining issue in several congressional races. Lawmakers are increasingly being rated and tracked based on their votes and public statements on blockchain, stablecoins, and digital asset markets.
Green opposed major crypto-related bills, including the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, which aimed to create clearer regulatory frameworks for stablecoins and broader crypto markets. Both bills were designed to reduce uncertainty and define oversight responsibilities for digital assets.
Crypto advocacy groups say opposition to such bills signals resistance to innovation and financial modernization. That criticism is now being used directly in campaign messaging funded by crypto PACs.
Super PACs like Protect Progress cannot donate directly to candidates or coordinate with campaigns. Instead, they operate independently by purchasing advertising and funding political messaging designed to influence voters.
Christian Menefee seen as pro-crypto alternative
Green’s main challenger in the Democratic primary is Christian Menefee. Crypto advocacy circles consider Menefee more open to blockchain adoption and real-world crypto use cases.
The advocacy group Stand With Crypto rates lawmakers and candidates based on their crypto policy positions. It labels Green as “strongly against crypto” and Menefee as “strongly supports crypto,” based on questionnaires, voting records, and public comments.
Menefee has expressed support for practical blockchain applications, including using distributed ledger systems to secure property records and reduce deed fraud. He has suggested that blockchain tools could help modernize government systems and protect working families from scams.
That contrast gives crypto PACs a clear narrative: replace anti-crypto incumbents with candidates who support blockchain innovation and digital asset regulation clarity.
Fairshake expands election influence
The spending in the Texas race is part of a much larger national strategy. Fairshake and its affiliates have built a massive election war chest to shape Congress into a more crypto-friendly body.
During the last federal election cycle, Fairshake and related groups spent roughly $130 million backing candidates supportive of digital asset policy. The organization reported raising nearly $200 million more in preparation for the upcoming midterms.
Another affiliate, Defend American Jobs, recently announced a separate $5 million effort supporting Senate candidate Barry Moore, who is considered pro-crypto. These targeted investments show a coordinated approach: reward supportive candidates and pressure or replace critics.
Texas primary draws early attention
Texas is one of the earliest states to hold primary elections, making it an attractive testing ground for crypto-funded political strategy. Early wins can build momentum, refine messaging, and signal strength to other candidates nationwide.
With millions of dollars now flowing into selected races, crypto policy is shifting from a niche issue to a campaign priority. Industry groups are no longer just lobbying behind the scenes — they are directly shaping voter perception through large-scale media buys and political outreach.
Whether this strategy succeeds will depend on voter response. But one thing is clear: crypto PAC spending is becoming a major force in US elections, and Texas is the latest battleground where blockchain policy meets ballot politics.